MINUTES OF ZBA MEETING                                                                                   

Date:  March 12, 2008

Town Hall - 5910 Sacandaga Road

Galway, New York 12074                             

 

Meeting called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chair, Jon Hallgren.  Clerk called the roll:

 

MEMBERS PRESENT:  Jon Hallgren, Herb Kopper, Tim Bogdan, Brian Hendrie, and Mark Kindinger

 

MEMBERS ABSENT: None

 

ALSO PRESENT:  Carol DeLorme, Clerk; George Weed, town board liaison; and 5 people in audience (including applicant)

 

PURPOSE AND PROCEDURE OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

Chair explained the purpose and procedure of the ZBA.  Applicant indicated she was familiar and understood. 

 

REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING

All members of the Board previously reviewed the minutes of the February 13, 2008 meeting.  Herb Kopper made further comment on last month’s discussion concerning referring questions/comments about what constitutes a “buildable lot” to town board.  Feels it more appropriate to have them presented to zoning consultant (Nan) and then have her discuss the matter with the town board.  As this was not meant as a correction/amendment of the minutes, Chair felt further discussion should be deferred to ‘Other Business’ portion of tonight’s meeting.  No other comments.  Motion by Brian Hendrie to approve the minutes as presented.  Seconded by Mark Kindinger.  Voice vote:  All ayes.  Carried.

 

PUBLIC HEARING OPENED by Chair @ 7:34 P.M - Clerk read the legal notice as it appeared in the Daily Gazette on 03/03/08. 

 

PUBLIC MEETING

 

Application #08-002 – Request of Lorraine Vought-Nicklin for area variance(s) need for replacement of an existing single story seasonal cottage with a new, 2-story home at less than the required setback(s) on lake front property located at 1363 Point Road in the Lake District in the Town of Galway, tax parcel #198.6-1-22

Chair noted for the record that building/zoning officer put down requested variances as 5’ and 4’.  However, applicant’s notes in the application are more correct (requesting a 20’ variance and a 21’ variance).  Ms. Vought-Nicklin was in attendance and provided a history of the property and explained her current proposal.  Following research/surveying of the property, discovered that her lot is actually only 35.1 feet in width, even though her deed states it is 37.5’.  Original plan for rebuilding was to follow the exact same footprint.  However, since existing camp encroaches an adjacent neighbor (Garver-Percy) property line (corner of house is 5.1’ west of line), she cannot do that (has to correct this error).  Current plan is to construct a 24’ wide by 40’ long 2-story house on the property, placing it evenly on the lot (parallel to both side property lines).  With a 1-foot overhang on either side, this would give her 4.5’ on each side property line. In addition, she is requesting a variance on the lake side.  Cannot push the building back any further because the septic system, is in the back.  Size of her lot as well as location of wells on adjoining properties dictates this location for her septic.  New house will include a deck with stairs on the lake side.  Has discussed options with her architect: Not really feasible to reduce the width of the building.  Has discussed options with builder/architect: possibility of reducing size of overhang (would prefer not to, however, citing protection it would afford the building from prevailing winds).  Can’t really make the house any narrower  Also trying to meet health requirements by improving the septic system, maintaining the required setbacks there. 

Chair – First should address/agree that this is a preexisting substandard size lot, does have a house on it, and therefore is considered a buildable lot (does not require variance consideration).  Also acknowledged that it is a very narrow lot.  Chair addressed concerns expressed earlier in the week by member Brian Hendrie about only access to lot being a right-of-way.  Chair did confer with board counsel, Peter Reilly, who informed him that because this is on existing town maps and the lot/right-of-way has existed, a right-of-way to this lot would be acceptable.  Neighbor, Ms. Rowan, was in attendance and stated she has no objection to the proposal.  Chair:  Proposed house includes a deck/stair system off the front of the house.  Request for variance would be from any structure attached to the house (therefore from the stairs, rather than the drip edge of the house).  Variance from lake would be 17’ to accommodate the stairs.  Chair informed Ms. Vought-Nicklin of precedent of a minimum allowable setback of 5’.  ZBA has held fast to this requirement.  Cannot recall ever granting the minimum 5’ on two sides.  Board likes to see 10’ on at least one side for accessibility for emergency vehicles/personnel.  Did acknowledge, however, that narrowness of this lot is a problem.  Builder, Joe Constantino, stated distance between the two houses will be in excess of 20’.  Chair countered that the only problem with that is that there is nothing preventing a property owner from erecting a fence of planting trees on a property line which would then render that access useless.  While applicant owns the right-of-way to lake, access is provided to neighbor (Catherine Blasé) by deed restriction.  Brian – inclined to go for the double 5’ as she currently has a house that [encroaches a property line] and is trying to correct a bad situation.  Currently has no access on one side and only 4’ on the other.  Could cut her drip line back as an option.  Herb Kopper – Agreed with Brian.  Proposal would be an improvement.  Appears to be enough open space between buildings.  Tim Bogdan – Also agreed.  Can’t make the house any narrower.  Also, house is on the lake; not like there is another row of houses that emergency equipment would need to get to.  Catherine Blasé - Stated she has no intention of erecting any fences, etc.  She has a sailboat and currently uses the right-of-way to pull the boat to the water by pick-up truck.  Would not want to block it in any way.  No objections to Ms. Vought-Nicklin’s proposal.  No further discussion. 

 

Motion by Tim Bogdan to close public hearing.  Seconded by Brian Hendrie.  Voice vote:  All ayes.  Motion carried.  PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. 

 

 

PUBLIC MEETING Opened 8:05 p.m.

 

Motion by Brian Hendrie that application #08-002 falls under Type II list under SEQR and, therefore, no further action under SEQR is required.  Seconded – Tim Bogan.  No further discussion.  Roll call vote: Jon Hallgren, yes; Tim Bogdan, yes; Herb Kopper, yes; Brian Hendrie, yes; and Mark Kindinger, yes.  Motion carried. 

 

Chair recapped:  This lot is a pre-existing substandard size lot with a building on it; therefore, considered a ‘buildable lot’ and not subject to variance review/approval.  Request is unique because the current house has been only 4’ from one boundary line and over the other boundary line.  Therefore, this plan is improving the current situation.  Consideration is for 2, 20’ side lot variances (measured from the drip line), which would give it the minimum 5’ setback on both sides, as well as a 17’ variance (measured from the stairs) so that it will be 33’ from the lake.   Applicant and builder indicated agreement with this.  No further discussion or comments from audience. 

Motion by Mark Kindinger to grant final approval to the request of Lorraine Vought-Nicklin (Application #08-002) for variances as stated above to allow construction of a new 24’ x 40’ house on property located at 1363 Point Road in the Lake District of the Town of Galway, tax parcel #198.6-1-22, per plot plan/drawings submitted with application dated 01/31/08.  Seconded – Tim Bogdan. No further discussion.    Roll call vote:  All ayes.  Motion carried.  GRANTED two 20’ SIDE LOT VARIANCES AND A 17’ VARIANCE FROM THE LAKE.  Applicant was informed to contact building/code enforcement officer for applicable permit once letter of approval from ZBA has been received. 

 

 

PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR  – None requested

 

 

OTHER BUSINESS

 

Herb Kopper – Since Nan is a hired consultant for zoning regulation matters, more appropriate to have her sit down with [the ZBA] and then relay concerns/questions to the town board.  Chair reiterated: ZBA would like clarification from the town board of the date the town is using for qualifying (granting ‘grandfathered’ status) and clearly establish what constitutes a preexisting, substandard size, buildable lot in the town.  Guidelines for code enforcement officer and ZBA to follow should be included in the zoning regulations.  

 

Motion to adjourn by Mark Kindinger.  Seconded – Tim Bogdan.  Voice Vote:  All ayes.  Motion carried. 

Meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. 

 

 

Respectfully submitted,

Carol L. DeLorme

Carol L. DeLorme, Clerk